美容業界に特化したサロン物件専門サイトのBENEFIT
     
  • 新着:30件
  • 会員限定配信:834件
  • 青山 安東不動産
  • 宅地建物取引業免許
  • 神奈川県知事(02)第028781号
受付:10:00-19:00(土日祝除く)
phone
bg

“my” vs. “mine” within the multiple owner possessive

“my” vs. “mine” within the multiple owner possessive

“I therefore enjoy you getting my and Gregg’s son to college today.” – however, I suggest “our child” or the child’s name might possibly be more natural than just “my and Gregg’s boy”?

When i accept Warsaw Usually, would it remain grammatically correct to use “mine” in this situation, if you think out-of “mine” given that writing on “my son”? That is, let’s say the first phrase try that it?:

https://datingranking.net/lovoo-review/

– Ok, however, I think Gregg’s boy comes first in that circumstances to make clear what “mine” are dealing with:

Actually, it is far from specific throughout the modern whether or not we are talking about two pupils. If it is you to, and the presenter nonetheless desires discuss one another themself and Gregg, however envision “Gregg’s and you can my man” would-be natural than simply “My and you may Gregg’s boy”. While there are two – I might choose “Gregg’s and you will my children”, I do believe.

Hey porsche, I’m however not yes

– I’m sure it is really not everything asked, but the a great deal more I think regarding it, this new quicker need I get a hold of to mention possibly Gregg otherwise myself; the other person knows whose son is involved. If we establish the child in order to somebody I do not believe we usually say, “That is Gregg’s and you may my child”, however, either “That is our girl” or “It is my daughter”. Next, I do believe we had be much more browsing state “my boy” otherwise “my child” than simply “my personal kid”, would not i? Or as i said before, only fool around with the label:

To the analogy provided regarding the new concern, my personal is right and you may mine grammatically hopeless – the others is just design.

– I concur that everything you state ‘s the way to the latest totally new concern, nevertheless people is not only on style, it’s about group of absolute. I simply do not think you to “my and Gregg’s son” try sheer English. It will not voice for me such some thing a local speaker create say.

Commonly, We accept nearly all that you told you, apart from one thing

Your asserted that the first phrase is not all that clear. I disagree. All type supply up until now has a very specific meaning:

can simply suggest exactly the same thing. A number of will say that is ungrammatical, that have “my” future first, in case perhaps not ungrammatical, it’s about sensed rude from the all of the. So it pronoun change is entirely unacceptable, in casual address. For folks who cam in this way, anyone, “educated” or not, have a tendency to think you’re an earlier teen just who can not establish its cellphone.

may also merely suggest Greg features a child, you have a unique son, and you will people took one another pupils to school. While this including matical, it’s still rude. Comprehend the review a lot more than regarding the “my”.

Notice, evey single one of those types is totally unambiguous. Maybe are common grammatical, many can be stopped getting grounds mentioned.

Last, Tend to, your feedback regarding the need to speak about Greg is extremely well removed. Particularly for instances when Greg and you have children together with her, it would be not likely to mention Greg after all (which makes it even crisper you to “mine” meaans a couple of more kids). Very first, by discussing Greg, it’s at the least suggested that he’s not in fact establish. If that try the fact, why must he also be stated? You’d simply state

We entirely agree that all sentences you’ve provided is actually unambiguous, but these include all the consequence of our very own interpretation of modern phrase. Ok, due to the fact sbee following requires in the event it would be ‘my’, the guy do inform you, in case i make modern sentence whilst really stands as opposed to that remark, i quickly nevertheless think it is unsure. I thinkl that is what I intended.